Everyone else is either a boutique brand (like Hasselblad) or charge ridiculous prices for their rebranded cameras (Leica).Īt least, unlike Leica's rebranded Panasonic cameras, Hasselblad hand-makes unique camera designs.īut just because they're used in NASA doesn't mean much - Windows XP (and, at times, even older OSes) are used in many high-end situations, doesn't necessarily mean that they're better. Canon is an exception - they're the best camera company in the world, with a third-party lens ecosystem that no other brand has.īut generally speaking, the most technologically advanced cameras come out of Japan. Sales and photographers themselves speak of this. ![]() Especially when Nikon has all but decimated by Sony. They just happen to be leaders in other industries as well as cameras - namely game consoles, audio equipment, TVs, etc.įurthermore, calling them "basic" and "below Canon and Nikon" is nonsense. They have a big and very experienced R&D department and know what they're doing. They're a tech giant, they own Sony Pictures, and apart from Sony Alpha, they make the VENICE series of cinematography cameras. moreHasselblad also uses a large amount of Sony sensors. ![]() CptPower, Hasselblad used by Nasa is the best cameras money can buy.Īnd when comes o basic cameras fo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |